Closing California's Parks:
It was a Bad Idea Back in 1933
Ridiculous Proposal to Close California’s Parks
We've Been There, Done That
“Responding to the Governor’s drastic budget cut proposal and pressure by the California Taxpayer’s Association, a state senate fact-finding committee recommended that the state park system budget be reduced by two-thirds for the next two fiscal years and some parks closed. The committee explained that it was making this recommendation because in tough economic times recreation is ‘one of the least essential activities of state government.’”
Grim news, eh?
The above account might sounds like it was ripped from today’s headlines; actually it's how I would have reported on California’s great budget crisis of 1933 if I was a reporter way back then. The Governor and some legislators of that era did in fact attempt to gut the parks department and did make inane comments about the value of state parks.
Park supporters were outraged by this hare-brained attempt to de-fund the park system. They pointed out that parks stimulated the economy by encouraging tourism and contributed to public health by providing recreational opportunities and relief from the stresses of difficult times. Director Charles Wing argued that state parks were “not a luxury, but an essential part of the life and attractiveness of the state.”
Fortunately for California State Parks and the millions who visit them, the recommendations made by the misguided politicos in 1933 were rejected.
An earlier generation of Californians defended state parks from unreasonable attacks.
Will our generation do the same?
- John's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Delicious
Digg
Propeller
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati

